Street Update - Stories and news from the homeless community.

From the Streets January 2006
As reported by Michael Diehl of the BOSS Berkeley/Civil Rights Community Organizer

Article 1: Police Harassment Continues - The Problem of 5150s and Jail Time | Article 2: No Shelter from the Weather - No Housing | Article 3: Mobile Crisis, 5150s and the Police | Article 4: People's Park Advisory Board

Police Harassment Continues - The Problem of 5150s and Jail Time

The month of January saw a continued elevated harassment by the police of the homeless both in the Southside and in the downtown Shattuck area. Another sweep occurred around People’s Park this month following last month’s sweep. In the Southside it seems a lot of the homeless in the area have been cited for trespassing or other violations like illegal possession of a shopping cart.

Also, there were aggressive police efforts to clear the area around Martin Luther King Jr. Park of homeless sleeping. A group of women sleeping by the main library at night were moved on. Open container alcohol violation tickets were also given to a number of the homeless. It also seems the number of homeless going to John George Psychiatric Pavilion picked up in joint actions of the police and the mobile crisis team has been up significantly of late. People continue to have their belongings taken on the street by public works working with the police.

In January, a number of street youth reappeared who were sent to Santa Rita over the holidays.  Feelings of outrage, of wanting to respond by acts of violent window breaking were expressed by three people on the streets to myself but were not acted upon as once again I sought to keep the peace. This is why we decided to organize a speak-out at the city council to address the issues of the homeless on January 24th (see below).

No Shelter from the Weather - No Housing        

The Berkeley Homeless Union now under the direction of Bob Mills and with my collaboration from the BOSS Community Organization Team in response to the anger over the continued police harassment (see above), jailing and 5150ing of the homeless (see below) and concerns about the emergency winter shelter being closed (see the Dec. 2005 street report) acted to get people organized to try to keep the peace at home by getting people to go to the city council to speak out about the issues we have been hearing about.  I hear these concerns as I go about doing my street outreach.

Bob who is often to be found at Tully’s coffee shop on Center and Shattuck (where the Berkeley Homeless Union meets every Thursdays at 1pm) hears them there or out on Shattuck. On the January 24th city council meeting six of us showed and it being a slow council night it turned out were able to get a good amount of public comment in. The city council asked city staff to look into getting St. Mark’s roof fixed (damaged before New Year’s Eve during a torrential rain) or a new site found.

The following city council meeting the city staff tried to put the onus of finding a site for the emergency shelter on J.C. Orton and the Catholic Workers. In public comment I spoke to this having talked to J.C. Orton who had spoken to a number of churches to no avail. 4 of us spoke at that meeting. Meetings in February were set up with Mayor Tom Bates and Michael Caplan from the city manager’s office to deal with the issue of the need for shelter, for housing and around the situation of the lack of vouchers from the Berkeley Housing Authority. This was arranged by Danny McMullan from the Disabled People’s Outside Project.

We began meeting with Pat Wall around the issues of the emergency winter shelter, the lack of Section 8 vouchers in the face of stepped up police enforcement and jailing and 5150ing of the homeless and concerns that the brick and mortar focus of the mayor is an expensive and will defund other homeless services when with the number of for rent signs in Berkeley more Section 8 vouchers would be a better more effective way to house the homeless but with the problems of the Berkeley Housing Authority paperwork to get those vouchers is not being submitted and insensitive staff are a source of abuse for clients.

It is these client complaints that attracted the attention of the federal government’s Housing and Urban Development department. Meanwhile Oakland Housing Authority at the end of the month opened up their waiting list to new applicants.

Mobile Crisis, 5150s and the Police

At the Berkeley Mental Health Commission which I chair Berkeley Mental Health mobile crisis worker Terry Kalahar asked that the Commission pass an advisory resolution urging that mobile crisis workers no longer be required to 5150 calls (where a client may be hospitalized for 72 hours if they are evaluated to be a threat to themselves or another or as David Wei also of the mobile crisis team says is true in 40% of the 5150s of the homeless they are deemed gravely unable to care for themselves) have to always go out with a police officer.

There has been a significant split in the BMH staff over this issue. David Wei addressed these concerns as did BMH director Harvey Tureck, concerns about staff safety. David Wei also feels by working with the police he is able to keep homeless people out of jail and to make the police more sensitive to mental health client issues. New BMH commissioner Pam Wilson who has been homeless spoke of the problems maintaining hard to get housing when police show up with mobile crisis raising concerns among neighbors and landlords.

Mental health clients have lost housing as result of this and being hospitalized. I have talked to a number of mental health clients who became homeless after losing housing as a result of their being in mental crisis and lack of sensitivity from the mental health system and due to being ousted and humiliated by these sorts of interventions. The commission voted 7 for, with 4 abstentions and 1 opposed to recommend to BMH that only in situations where there was a concern about the possibility of being in a violent situation would having a police officer be required as is policy in San Francisco. Staff was asked to work on developing a plan to address both staff and client concerns about safety around 5150 calls.

People's Park Advisory Board

On Thursday Jan. 19th the first meeting of the reinstituted People’s Park community advisory board as selected by the University of California occurred at Mario’s La Fiesta’s Banquet Room right next to the park. I have been pushing for its revival as a way to work out conflict between the university, park users and activists, the homeless, neighbors and merchant concerns. Many of the activists such as myself who applied for the Board were rejected so we wanted to see if there was any activist representation. Fortunately Dana Merryday who has been a voice for our concerns on the Board in recent years past and Lydia Gans from Food not Bombs were present but in the name of “balance” the concerns of park users was a distinct and clear minority.

The big issue of contention of late has been over the Free Box. In the fall of last year activists built free boxes only to have them torn down by the University. The University and neighbors feel that the Free Box torched last March is a magnet for drug problems but they also complained about the drug problem being bad and even worsening in the time after the loss of the Free Box and have used this to justify police sweeps of the park. So obviously the Free Box is not the source of the problem. Meanwhile there is no place except the Suitcase Clinic on Tuesday evening where homeless people can get clothes. BOSS has started a clothes collection program Berkeley’s homeless after it was unable to deliver donated clothes to the People’s Park when the University removed it.

Putting together a flyer and doing outreach the day before I was instrumental in getting 13 folks out to the Advisory Board meeting where the removal of the Free Box and the iron fist of police action against the homeless in People’s Park were major focuses in the public comment. Originally the public comment was slated to go at the end of the meeting but Irene Haggerty of the University decided to move it to the start as had been the practice in the past. Jon Selawsky a progressive member of the Berkeley school board moved to have the Free Box issue put on the next meeting agenda which to our satisfaction got the support of the majority of the board as did the issue of addressing the need for social services for the homeless in People’s Park.

It had been my hope that by not aggressively countering the UCPD police action with Copwatch activity that they would go after the specific drug gang activity in People’s Park that many of the homeless who use the park or did before it stop feeling safe. They have done blanket sweeps instead and the park still remains a place where Berkeley Liberation Radio deejay a man friendly to the hippie 60s roots of the park was assaulted in the park by thugs. I feel UCPD’s iron fist has only made the problem worse by driving those who care about the vitality of People’s  Park away. The police statistics given out by UC show police action is not directed against drug dealing but is rather petty harassment of people for things like bike code violations.

The University has opposed having a bike rack in People’s Park thus making it easier for bicycles to be stolen in People’s Park which has been an ongoing problem. I feel drug war tactics have once again proven to be totally counter-productive in helping engender a lack of community an atmosphere of fear, of being in a war zone.

We believe that the University wants the present situation as a way to dispirit support for People’s Park as a center of countercultural resistance and to eventually justify building over the park. We do not believe they are serious about going after serious criminal activity. By arresting homeless people and sending them to Santa Rita for minor petty offenses the UC staff and police have caused the homeless to feel hostile to their efforts and have lowered their spirits into despondency and fear and sleep deprivation.

Overall much as I have loved People’s Park I feel very dispirited feel there is not sufficient community support to “reclaim” People’s Park both from the University and the anti-people criminal activity that preys on the homeless and others such as the neighbors. I feel the neighbors have demonized park activists so there is no real communication of how we can work together to create a better People’s Park.

I have been choosing to be spend less time there because it seems I get better return putting my energies elsewhere since the divide between the ideal that People’s Park is suppose to be about and the depressing reality is distressing to me. I feel with gentrification pushing activists out of Berkeley  and into Oakland and elsewhere like we fighting a losing rearguard battle.

I feel like the bubble of progressive radicalism that Berkeley still represents and to a very significant degree is slowly but surely succumbing to the pressures of gentrification but also a growing despair in the face of the growing right wing assault on basic freedoms, succumbing to a collective national atmosphere of engendered fear to speak out for those freedoms and for economic justice.

I will now quote from William H. Whyte in his book “City: Rediscovering the Center” talking about public places “Fear proves itself…(security) moves sharply cut down the number of people using the park-much to the delight of dope dealers, who now had the place much more to themselves and their customers.”

To respond to this article, email Michael Diehl at adversary359@yahoo.com.

back top

 

2065 Kittredge Street, Suite E Berkeley, CA 94704 | phone: (510) 649-1930 | fax: (510) 649-0627 | staff@createpeaceathome.org